The following is a guest post from Rick Console, a New Jersey personal injury attorney from Console and Hollawell, PC.
When it comes to a personal injury case, social media will only work against the plaintiff. It would be very difficult to find a post online from the defendant admitting fault, which leaves social networking as a resource that can only be used by the defense attorneys and insurance companies. Most personal injury lawyers know of the risks posed by these websites and will warn their clients, but sometimes that is not enough.
During discovery, the defense attorney will most certainly request the login information for all of the plaintiffs online social networking accounts. Of course the attorney will object to this and fight it rigorously, but more times than not this information will have to be disclosed. The information on these sites could be misconstrued and used to dispute a client's claim.
If a case does make it to trial, chances are that the jury will be more understanding than the defense attorneys about what the plaintiff posted. They will know that a life-altering injury does not mean you should not be able to attend your nephew's third birthday party, but they will be able to understand that someone with a serious back injury should not be in a limbo contest. The problem with this is that many times the case does not make it to trial so this tolerance will not be found.
It is important for personal injury lawyers to find out what their client has been posting online because even if they insist the client shut down all of their sites, the defense may win a motion to obtain the login information. For example, in one recent Pennsylvania case a defense attorney won their motion to obtain the plaintiff's Facebook login because her page was public and had information contradicting her claim. This ruling will no doubt be used as evidence that Facebook is a definite well of information, but the court did explain that this will not be a hard-and-fast rule.
The court stated, "The Court does not hold that discovery of a party's social networking information is available as a matter of course. Rather, there must be a good faith basis that discovery will lead to relevant information." The court went on to explain that since her information was already public it was appropriate and just for the defense to have that information.
New Jersey personal injury lawyer, Richard Console explained that he always urges his clients to shut down their social networking sites when they file a claim, but sometimes it's not enough. "Despite disabling their accounts the defense can still request information from these social networking profiles. It is a hard situation because the information found can be so subjective that it is misconstrued as proof that the claim is not valid."
The role of social networking in personal injury claims becomes larger each year as more and more people join and share information on these sites. As it stands now, most jurisdictions will evaluate these requests on a case by case basis, but a firm rule on whether or not social networking sites are public domain could be made in the near future.
